bitunix

Spent Outputs Aged 3y–5y

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
12.51K
2026-10-27 · 12,514
1D change
-7.78%
Prev. 13.57K
7D change
-10.60%
Prev. 14K
30D change
+160.80%
Prev. 4.8K
4Y percentile
94%
All history 98%
All-time high
261.6K
2022-12-10 · -95.22%
1Y range
1.63K – 57.55K
Since 2009-01-12
Loading data…

About this metric

What it measures

Spent Outputs Aged 3y–5y is the number of outputs spent each day after staying unspent for three to five years. Its two-year-wide age interval captures outputs held for roughly a cycle-length period, with each output counted once regardless of its balance.

How to read it

A jump indicates long-dormant outputs becoming active; a quiet stretch indicates few are being consumed. On December 10, 2022, the count reached 261,595 with BTC around $17,134, far beyond the full-history median of 717, so the largest event cannot be read simply as profit-taking into high prices.

Three to five years since output creation is not proof that an owner held through a complete market cycle. Wallet migrations can consume old outputs without a change in ownership, and the band is wider than neighbouring one-year bands; compare value and activity within the same interval rather than ranking raw counts as conviction.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Type
Single value
Data since
2009-01-12
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
6,498

FAQ

Does this interval always represent a complete Bitcoin cycle?

No. It is an elapsed output-age range, not a cycle definition. Market phases vary in length, and an internal transfer can create a new output without a new investment.

Why compare this band cautiously with the two-to-three-year band?

This interval spans two years while the neighbouring interval spans one. They contain different eligible output populations, so their raw counts do not directly compare spending propensity.

Does a large count mean dormant supply has been permanently sold?

No. The old outputs are consumed, but the resulting outputs may still belong to the same holder. Destination and entity-adjusted flow data are needed to assess economic ownership changes.