bitunix

Seller Exhaustion Constant

Vaihteluväli
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Asteikko
  • LineaarinenLineaarinen
  • LogaritminenLogaritminen
Uusin
0.0138
2026-10-28 · 0.013786
1D-muutos
+1.67%
Edell. 0.0136
7D-muutos
+13.55%
Edell. 0.0121
30D-muutos
-49.18%
Edell. 0.0271
4Y-persentiili
9%
Koko historia 14%
Kaikkien aikojen huippu
0.4645
2013-04-16 · -97.03%
1Y-vaihteluväli
0.00686 – 0.0829
Alkaen 2009-01-03
Ladataan dataa…

Tietoa tästä mittarista

Mitä se mittaa

The Seller Exhaustion Constant multiplies the fraction of Bitcoin supply in unrealized profit by 30-day price volatility. It is a dimensionless composite shown as a ratio, combining the breadth of profitable supply with recent price variability.

Näin luet sitä

Low values can reflect a small profitable share, subdued volatility, or both; the exhaustion interpretation is strongest when both inputs are low. Higher readings indicate a larger product of those inputs, not a direct count of sellers. On October 17, 2022, the value was about 0.0103, compared with a full-history median near 0.0429.

The product can hide different combinations of its inputs, so inspect supply in profit and volatility separately. A low reading does not prove sellers are finished, early zero values may reflect limited price history, and the exact volatility convention affects scale; it is not an annualized return or a probability.

Tiheys
Päivittäin (UTC 00:00)
Omaisuuserä
BTC
Tyyppi
Yksittäinen arvo
Dataa alkaen
2009-01-03
Uusin data
2026-10-28
Datapisteet
6,508

UKK

Why is the Seller Exhaustion Constant not constant?

Constant is the indicator's name, not a claim that its value is fixed. Both the share of profitable supply and rolling price volatility change, so their product changes each day.

Does a low value always mean most coins are at a loss?

No. Very low volatility can produce a low result even if much of supply remains profitable. The two inputs need to be checked to distinguish quiet profitable markets from quiet markets with widespread losses.

Can the value be read as a percentage chance of a bottom?

No. It is a product of two inputs, with no calibrated probability interpretation. A reading of 0.01 does not mean a 1% chance of any market event.