bitunix

Whale Exchange Deposit Volume

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
13.91K
2026-10-27 · 13,912.5137 · BTC
1D change
-9.00%
Prev. 15.29K
7D change
-29.58%
Prev. 19.76K
30D change
+781.40%
Prev. 1.58K
4Y percentile
80%
All history 73%
All-time high
129.51K
2015-11-05 · -89.26%
1Y range
448.88 – 33.76K
Since 2011-08-19
Loading data…

About this metric

What it measures

Whale Exchange Deposit Volume sums the BTC transferred from entities classified as large holders to tracked exchange addresses each day. Entity grouping links addresses believed to share control, so the classification concerns the sender's holdings rather than the amount of each individual deposit.

How to read it

Rising volume shows more BTC arriving at exchanges from the identified large-holder group; falling volume means a smaller contribution in BTC. The daily total reached about 129,507 BTC on November 5, 2015. Compare it with Whale Exchange Deposit Count: higher volume with few deposits implies a different transfer mix from high volume spread across many deposits.

A large holder can send a small amount, and a deposit can be collateral or settlement rather than a sale. Entity clustering and exchange labels are estimates, while intermediary routes may hide the original source; this is identified cohort activity, not a complete record of every large investor.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Type
Single value
Unit
BTC
Data since
2011-08-19
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
5,549

FAQ

Does every whale deposit have to be a large BTC transfer?

No. Whale classification applies to the source entity's holdings, not a minimum amount for each deposit. A classified entity can transfer a small portion of its balance.

How does whale deposit volume differ from whale deposit count?

Volume adds the BTC deposited; count adds the deposit events. Comparing both helps distinguish larger average deposits from more frequent small transfers by the same cohort.

Does a rise in whale deposits prove large holders reduced their holdings?

No. These are gross deposits, without subtracting withdrawals or other receipts. The entity may also retain economic ownership when coins move to an exchange account.