Miner-to-Exchange Inflows by Pool
- 1M1M
- 3M3M
- 6M6M
- 1Y1Y
- ALLALL
- ValueValue
- ShareShare
About this metric
What it measures
Miner-to-Exchange Inflows by Pool sums the BTC transferred each day from labeled mining-pool wallets to identified exchange addresses. Series such as F2Pool, AntPool, ViaBTC and Foundry USA show the source of the deposits; values are gross daily inflows in BTC, not net flows or shares of hash rate.
How to read it
A higher pool reading means more of its tracked BTC reached exchanges that day; repeated elevated readings indicate sustained deposit activity. F2Pool reached about 5,503 BTC on September 15, 2017, while Foundry USA's recorded high was about 344.5 BTC on April 11, 2025. These pool-specific histories help distinguish broad miner flows from a single source's spike.
Pools differ in payout schedules, wallet practices and label coverage, so deposit size is not a direct comparison of financial stress. Transfers may represent payouts, custody or collateral rather than sales. Individual series begin at different dates, and a zero only means no identified flow in that series, not that the pool stopped mining.
- Frequency
- Daily (UTC 00:00)
- Asset
- BTC
- Category
- Transfers & Transactions
- Type
- Breakdown
- Unit
- BTC
- Data since
- 2011-08-17
- Latest data
- 2026-10-27
FAQ
Do miner-to-exchange inflows show that miners sold BTC?
They identify a transfer to an exchange, not a completed trade. The BTC could be sold later or used for collateral, custody or settlement.
Why do pool inflow spikes differ so much in size?
Pool scale, payout timing and wallet organization differ, and a large transfer may move accumulated holdings rather than one day's production. Compare each pool with its own history before comparing pools.
Can pool exchange inflows be used to estimate hash-rate share?
No. These are BTC transfers from tracked wallets, not blocks found or hash power supplied. Historical balances, fees and the choice of deposit destination all affect the amount.
