bitunix

WisdomTree Bitcoin ETF (BTCW) Estimated Holdings

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
2.05K
2026-10-27 · 2,054.3419 · BTC
1D change
0.00%
Prev. 2.05K
7D change
0.00%
Prev. 2.05K
30D change
-0.02%
Prev. 2.05K
4Y percentile
56%
All history 56%
All-time high
4.15K
2025-02-05 · -50.53%
1Y range
1.58K – 2.31K
Since 2024-01-08
Loading data…

About this metric

What it measures

WisdomTree Bitcoin ETF (BTCW) Estimated Holdings records the estimated quantity of bitcoin held for BTCW, in BTC. The coin balance isolates the size of the fund’s bitcoin inventory from fluctuations in its dollar value.

How to read it

A rising coin balance indicates more bitcoin held for the fund, while a falling balance indicates less. BTCW’s recorded high was about 4,153 BTC on February 5, 2025, versus about 2,054 BTC on October 17, 2026. Relative changes can look large when the underlying inventory is modest, so check the absolute BTC change too.

Holdings can change through fund creations, redemptions, expenses and settlement timing. Estimates need not match a published fund total at every observation, and secondary-market share turnover does not directly alter the BTC inventory. A percentage change in holdings is not the fund’s return.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Type
Single value
Unit
BTC
Data since
2024-01-08
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
1,024

FAQ

How much BTC did WisdomTree BTCW hold at its recorded peak?

The series reached about 4,153 BTC on February 5, 2025. By October 17, 2026, the estimated balance was about 2,054 BTC.

Can a small BTCW transfer create a large percentage move?

Yes. The same BTC amount represents a larger percentage of a smaller starting balance. Read the absolute coin change alongside the percentage to judge the size of the movement.

Is BTCW holdings growth the same as ETF investment performance?

No. Holdings growth describes a change in coin quantity. Investment performance also depends on BTC price and fund costs, so an increase in holdings does not by itself imply a positive return.