bitunix

Revolut Holdings

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
26.86K
2026-10-27 · 26,864.2691 · BTC
1D change
-0.04%
Prev. 26.87K
7D change
-17.57%
Prev. 32.59K
30D change
-18.96%
Prev. 33.15K
4Y percentile
52%
All history 72%
All-time high
37.84K
2026-08-03 · -29.00%
1Y range
26.86K – 37.84K
Since 2019-11-26

About this metric

What it measures

Revolut Holdings reports the BTC balance in addresses identified as belonging to the tracked Revolut platform wallet set. Adding those balances gives a quantity of bitcoin held in the covered wallets, not a dollar valuation of customer crypto positions.

How to read it

Focus on sustained changes and on whether a sharp move persists across later observations. The balance was about 33,171 BTC on September 17, 2026 and 23,975 BTC on October 17, around 9,196 BTC lower over that month; it had previously reached about 37,836 BTC on August 3, 2026.

These moves do not reveal whether clients withdrew, changed positions or were served through a different custody setup. Transfers beyond the labeled wallet set and coverage revisions can alter the total. The chart is a platform balance estimate, not a measure of Revolut’s own treasury or the number of customers holding bitcoin.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Type
Single value
Unit
BTC
Data since
2019-11-26
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
2,528

FAQ

Does Revolut Holdings measure the platform’s own bitcoin investment?

The address-based balance does not distinguish corporate ownership from custody-related coins. It should not be interpreted as a disclosed corporate treasury position.

Why can Revolut holdings change sharply within a month?

The tracked balance changes when coins cross the covered wallet boundary, and large custody transfers or address revisions can cause abrupt moves. A balance change alone does not establish whether customers changed their economic exposure.

Can customer bitcoin exposure stay unchanged while the chart falls?

Yes. Coins can move to a different custody address outside the identified set while customer balances remain unchanged. The series observes wallet location, not each customer’s beneficial ownership.