bitunix

Exchange Internal Transfer to Balance Ratio

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
8.37%
2026-10-27 · 0.0836
1D change
-3.50%
Prev. 8.67%
7D change
+41.39%
Prev. 5.92%
30D change
-29.08%
Prev. 11.8%
4Y percentile
80%
All history 58%
All-time high
100%
2021-09-14 · -91.63%
1Y range
5.76% – 17.49%
Since 2011-08-17
Loading data…

About this metric

What it measures

Exchange Internal Transfer to Balance Ratio compares the volume moved between wallets attributed to the same exchange with the corresponding reserve balance, expressed as a percentage. It measures internal transfer intensity relative to holdings, not customer net flow.

How to read it

High readings show more internal movement relative to the reserve base, while low readings indicate quieter wallet operations. The full-history median is about 7.43%, and the series recorded 100% on September 14, 2021. A large reading can coexist with an unchanged total balance because moving coins internally need not bring money in or out.

Transfer volume is a flow and the reserve balance is a stock: the same coins may move repeatedly, so the ratio is not the percentage of unique coins touched. Wallet labels, balance timing and the measurement window affect comparisons. A sharp increase does not establish customer withdrawals or exchange distress.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Type
Single value
Data since
2011-08-17
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
5,551

FAQ

Can internal transfers rise while exchange reserves stay flat?

Yes. Transfers between the exchange’s own tracked wallets change their individual balances while leaving the combined balance unchanged. This ratio focuses on that operational movement.

Does a 100% reading mean every reserve coin moved once?

No. Aggregate transfer volume can include repeated movement of the same coins. The ratio does not track the fraction of unique reserve coins transferred.

How does this differ from cross-asset internal transfers?

This measure explicitly compares internal transfers with a balance base. The cross-asset version combines activity across assets under its own normalization, so equal percentages need not describe equal BTC movement.