bitunix

Likely Lost Supply

Range
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scale
  • LinearLinear
  • LogLog
Latest
1.46M
2026-10-27 · 1,455,559.3155 · BTC
1D change
+0.00%
Prev. 1.46M
7D change
+0.00%
Prev. 1.46M
30D change
+0.00%
Prev. 1.46M
4Y percentile
4%
All history 6%
All-time high
2.89M
2010-06-30 · -49.70%
1Y range
1.46M – 1.46M
Since 2009-01-03
Loading data…

About this metric

What it measures

Likely Lost Supply is the total BTC classified as probably lost by the underlying supply model. It is an estimate in BTC rather than proof of inaccessible private keys; the supplied metadata does not document the model's eligibility rules.

How to read it

A higher value assigns more supply to the probably lost category, while a decline removes coins from that estimate. The series peaked near 2.89 million BTC in June 2010 and stood near 1.46 million on October 17, 2026. Its ability to fall is a reminder that this is a revisable classification rather than a cumulative count of confirmed losses.

An unmoved coin may still be spendable, and the blockchain cannot reveal whether a private key has been lost. Do not infer a fixed dormancy cutoff from the metric name or equate it with all coins inactive for several years. Understand the model rules before using the estimate to adjust supply.

Frequency
Daily (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Category
Supply
Type
Single value
Unit
BTC
Data since
2009-01-03
Latest data
2026-10-27
Data points
6,507

FAQ

Can the blockchain prove how many bitcoins are lost?

It can show that coins remain unspent, but that alone cannot prove their keys are unavailable. This is a model estimate, not a count of all provably unspendable coins.

Why can Likely Lost Supply decrease?

Previously classified coins may move, or a model classification may change. The series declined from about 1.55 million BTC at the 2012 halving to about 1.46 million at the 2024 halving, so it is not a permanently increasing tally.

Is Likely Lost Supply the same as supply unmoved for five years?

No such equivalence is documented for this series. A five-year dormancy measure uses an explicit age threshold, whereas this estimate's eligibility rules are not provided in the available metadata.