bitunix

Revived Supply 5+ Years

Vaihteluväli
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Asteikko
  • LineaarinenLineaarinen
  • LogaritminenLogaritminen
Uusin
1.05K
2026-10-28 · 1,053.8976 · BTC
1D-muutos
+43.67%
Edell. 733.57
7D-muutos
-61.38%
Edell. 2.73K
30D-muutos
+94.35%
Edell. 542.27
4Y-persentiili
77%
Koko historia 91%
Kaikkien aikojen huippu
142.34K
2024-05-28 · -99.26%
1Y-vaihteluväli
94.02 – 11.74K
Alkaen 2009-01-12
Ladataan dataa…

Tietoa tästä mittarista

Mitä se mittaa

Revived Supply 5+ Years measures the BTC spent each day from outputs left unmoved for at least five years. It is a BTC flow from a long-dormant subset of supply, not the balance of all coins older than five years.

Näin luet sitä

A high reading flags an unusual release of very old supply, while low values show that few five-year coins moved that day. The recorded maximum was about 142,345 BTC on May 28, 2024, versus a full-history median near 47 BTC. Because this is a sparse series, a single large transfer can dwarf its typical daily level.

Five years of inactivity is not proof of lost keys, and reactivation does not establish an exchange deposit or sale. Compare any spike with transaction destinations and broader revival thresholds. The full-history median includes years when no coin could meet the age requirement, so it understates a typical level for the mature network.

Tiheys
Päivittäin (UTC 00:00)
Omaisuuserä
BTC
Kategoria
Tarjonta
Tyyppi
Yksittäinen arvo
Yksikkö
BTC
Dataa alkaen
2009-01-12
Uusin data
2026-10-28
Datapisteet
6,499

UKK

Do five-year-old coins moving prove lost bitcoins were recovered?

No. The coins may have remained under active control throughout their dormant period. A transfer only proves that those outputs were spendable when they moved.

Why can the five-year revival chart have such large spikes?

Most days involve little qualifying activity, but a single large old holding can move at once. The May 28, 2024 reading reached about 142,345 BTC; its size alone does not establish the transfer's purpose.

Why is the five-year series zero before 2014?

Bitcoin began in January 2009, so coins could not have spent five years dormant before 2014. Those initial zeros follow from the age threshold rather than from observed reluctance to spend.