bitunix

Seller Exhaustion Constant

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LinjärLinjär
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Senaste
0.0138
2026-10-28 · 0.013786
1D-förändring
+1.67%
Föreg. 0.0136
7D-förändring
+13.55%
Föreg. 0.0121
30D-förändring
-49.18%
Föreg. 0.0271
4Y-percentil
9%
Hela historiken 14%
Högsta nivå någonsin
0.4645
2013-04-16 · -97.03%
1Y-intervall
0.00686 – 0.0829
Sedan 2009-01-03
Läser in data…

Om detta mått

Vad det mäter

The Seller Exhaustion Constant multiplies the fraction of Bitcoin supply in unrealized profit by 30-day price volatility. It is a dimensionless composite shown as a ratio, combining the breadth of profitable supply with recent price variability.

Så läser du det

Low values can reflect a small profitable share, subdued volatility, or both; the exhaustion interpretation is strongest when both inputs are low. Higher readings indicate a larger product of those inputs, not a direct count of sellers. On October 17, 2022, the value was about 0.0103, compared with a full-history median near 0.0429.

The product can hide different combinations of its inputs, so inspect supply in profit and volatility separately. A low reading does not prove sellers are finished, early zero values may reflect limited price history, and the exact volatility convention affects scale; it is not an annualized return or a probability.

Frekvens
Dagligen (UTC 00:00)
Tillgång
BTC
Typ
Enskilt värde
Data sedan
2009-01-03
Senaste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
6,508

Vanliga frågor

Why is the Seller Exhaustion Constant not constant?

Constant is the indicator's name, not a claim that its value is fixed. Both the share of profitable supply and rolling price volatility change, so their product changes each day.

Does a low value always mean most coins are at a loss?

No. Very low volatility can produce a low result even if much of supply remains profitable. The two inputs need to be checked to distinguish quiet profitable markets from quiet markets with widespread losses.

Can the value be read as a percentage chance of a bottom?

No. It is a product of two inputs, with no calibrated probability interpretation. A reading of 0.01 does not mean a 1% chance of any market event.