bitunix

Entity-Adjusted Long-Term Holder Dormancy

Intervallo
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scala
  • LineareLineare
  • LogaritmicaLogaritmica
Più recenti
614.7
2026-10-28 · 614.657 · giorni
Variazione 1D
+39.23%
Prec. 441.5
Variazione 7D
-37.76%
Prec. 987.5
Variazione 30D
+9.31%
Prec. 562.3
Percentile 4Y
39%
Tutto lo storico 66%
Massimo storico
1.4M
2010-08-03 · -99.96%
Intervallo 1Y
310.8 – 2.6K
Dal 2009-01-12
Caricamento dati…

Informazioni sulla metrica

Cosa misura

Entity-Adjusted Long-Term Holder Dormancy divides coin days destroyed attributed to the long-term holder cohort by its corresponding transferred BTC volume, after filtering recognized internal transfers. It is an amount-weighted lifespan in days, using a cohort convention centered around 155 days.

Come leggerlo

An increase points to older holdings contributing more heavily to the cohort's transfers, while a decrease means relatively younger long-term holdings are moving. The series recorded about 3,145 days on July 21, 2022, then 290.9 the next day, illustrating how sharply the age mix or transfer denominator can change.

The early data contains an impossible value of about 1.41 million days on August 3, 2010, exceeding the network's age and requiring a data-quality check. Early sub-threshold values also should not be read as literal long-term holding periods; cohort weighting, sparse flows and inferred ownership limit interpretation.

Frequenza
Giornaliero (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Tipo
Valore singolo
Unità
giorni
Dati dal
2009-01-12
Dati più recenti
2026-10-28
Punti dati
6,499

FAQ

How does LTH Dormancy differ from LTH Coin Days Destroyed?

LTH CDD measures total BTC-days spent by the cohort. LTH Dormancy divides by the corresponding BTC volume to show age per BTC, so it can rise even if total CDD does not.

Does a high LTH Dormancy mean all long-term holders are moving coins?

No. It describes the coins contributing to that day's eligible transfers. Most long-term holdings may remain untouched while a small set of very old holdings dominates the average.

Can the early all-time high be used as a historical benchmark?

No. The 2010 observation implies a lifespan far longer than Bitcoin had existed. It should be reviewed as a calculation or input anomaly rather than treated as an actual coin age.