bitunix

Binary CDD (Supply-Adjusted CDD Above Average)

Intervallo
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scala
  • LineareLineare
  • LogaritmicaLogaritmica
Più recenti
0
2026-10-28 · 0
Variazione 1D
—
Prec. 0
Variazione 7D
-100.00%
Prec. 1
Variazione 30D
-100.00%
Prec. 1
Percentile 4Y
65%
Tutto lo storico 58%
Massimo storico
1
2009-01-12 · -100.00%
Intervallo 1Y
0 – 1
Dal 2009-01-03
Caricamento dati…

Informazioni sulla metrica

Cosa misura

Binary CDD compares daily Supply-Adjusted Coin Days Destroyed with its historical average. It returns 1 when the daily reading is above that baseline and 0 otherwise, giving a unitless flag for elevated coin-age expenditure rather than its magnitude.

Come leggerlo

Clusters of 1s indicate repeated days of above-average adjusted age spending; long runs of 0s indicate fewer such days. Both states occur throughout the record: the 2012 and 2016 halvings had readings of 1, while the 2020 and 2024 halvings had readings of 0, so a halving alone does not determine the flag.

The conversion discards size: a marginal exceedance and an enormous spike both show 1. The historical baseline and non-sale wallet transfers influence the signal; inspect the underlying Supply-Adjusted CDD to judge magnitude, and do not treat a binary state as a probability or directional forecast.

Frequenza
Giornaliero (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Tipo
Valore singolo
Dati dal
2009-01-03
Dati più recenti
2026-10-28
Punti dati
6,508

FAQ

What does a Binary CDD reading of 0 mean?

Supply-adjusted age expenditure did not exceed its historical-average baseline. It does not mean there were no transfers or no coin days destroyed.

What would a moving average of Binary CDD represent?

It would show the fraction of observations flagged 1 within that window. For example, an average of 0.4 means 40% of observations were above the baseline, not a 40% probability of a price move.

Why use Binary CDD instead of the underlying CDD?

It makes the persistence of above-average activity easier to see without a few huge spikes dominating the vertical scale. The trade-off is losing information about how large each day's age expenditure was.