bitunix

Proximity MVRV (Price to Near-Price Cost Basis)

Interval
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Seneste
0.996
2026-10-28 · 0.99594
1D-ændring
+0.04%
Forr. 0.996
7D-ændring
-0.33%
Forr. 0.999
30D-ændring
-0.33%
Forr. 0.999
4Y-percentil
29%
Hele historikken 30%
Højeste niveau nogensinde
1.936
2010-11-06 · -48.54%
1Y-interval
0.957 – 1.013
Siden 2010-07-18
Indlæser data…

Om denne måling

Hvad den måler

Proximity MVRV divides BTC price by Proximity Realized Price, a cost-basis average that gives greater weight to holdings acquired near the current price. The unitless ratio measures price relative to that locally weighted cost, rather than the average cost of all supply.

Sådan læses den

Above 1, spot exceeds the weighted cost; below 1, it sits beneath it. Larger positive deviations describe more local paper profit. The middle half of historical readings lies roughly between 0.993 and 1.033, so small moves around 1 are normal for this measure, unlike the wider scale of standard MVRV.

The weighting changes with proximity to spot, so the underlying mix can shift even without coins changing hands. A reading below 1 does not mean most supply or all holders are underwater. Standard MVRV cycle thresholds do not transfer to this narrow-range ratio.

Frekvens
Dagligt (UTC 00:00)
Aktiv
BTC
Type
Enkelt værdi
Data siden
2010-07-18
Seneste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
5,947

FAQ

Why does Proximity MVRV usually stay close to 1?

Its denominator emphasizes costs near the current market price, so it naturally follows spot more closely than the all-supply average cost. The full-history median is about 1.006.

Does Proximity MVRV identify short-term holders?

No. Proximity refers to the distance between acquisition cost and current price, not a fixed holding-age cutoff. An older holding can receive weight if its cost is close to spot.

What was a notable high in Proximity MVRV?

It reached about 1.305 on December 16, 2017, meaning spot was roughly 30.5% above the proximity-weighted cost. That historical reading is context, not a reusable peak threshold.