bitunix

Revived Supply 2+ Years

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LinjärLinjär
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Senaste
1.86K
2026-10-28 · 1,864.6066 · BTC
1D-förändring
+6.72%
Föreg. 1.75K
7D-förändring
-68.89%
Föreg. 5.99K
30D-förändring
-75.04%
Föreg. 7.47K
4Y-percentil
38%
Hela historiken 66%
Högsta nivå någonsin
225.17K
2018-12-04 · -99.17%
1Y-intervall
524.25 – 155.67K
Sedan 2009-01-12
Läser in data…

Om detta mått

Vad det mäter

Revived Supply 2+ Years counts BTC spent on a given day from outputs last moved at least two years earlier. Each qualifying output contributes its BTC amount, without multiplying by age; the series is a daily BTC flow.

Så läser du det

A spike means supply that sat through at least two years has moved, while low values indicate little spending from that older stock. The largest reading was about 225,172 BTC on December 4, 2018, when the accompanying BTC price was about $3,886. This shows that major dormancy breaks also occur at low prices, rather than only during strong rallies.

A few large outputs can dominate a day, and the data alone does not identify the owners or purpose of the transfers. Compare with the 1+ year series to see whether activity extends beyond more recently dormant coins. Zero readings before coins could reach two years are structural, not a behavioral signal.

Frekvens
Dagligen (UTC 00:00)
Tillgång
BTC
Kategori
Utbud
Typ
Enskilt värde
Enhet
BTC
Data sedan
2009-01-12
Senaste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
6,499

Vanliga frågor

How does Revived Supply 2+ Years differ from Coin Days Destroyed?

It counts qualifying BTC equally once their age exceeds two years. Coin Days Destroyed multiplies every spent coin's amount by its age, so very old coins carry more weight.

Was the largest two-year revival during a price rally?

The recorded maximum was about 225,172 BTC on December 4, 2018, at an accompanying BTC price near $3,886. That observation does not identify a sale or explain who moved the coins.

Can the 1+ and 2+ year series be added?

No. The 2+ year group is already included in 1+ years. Their difference describes spending of coins dormant between one and two years, subject to consistent age-boundary conventions.