bitunix

Proximity MVRV (Price to Near-Price Cost Basis)

Zakres
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LiniowaLiniowa
  • LogarytmicznaLogarytmiczna
Najnowsze
0.996
2026-10-28 · 0.99594
Zmiana 1D
+0.04%
Poprz. 0.996
Zmiana 7D
-0.33%
Poprz. 0.999
Zmiana 30D
-0.33%
Poprz. 0.999
Percentyl 4Y
29%
Cała historia 30%
Najwyższa wartość w historii
1.936
2010-11-06 · -48.54%
Zakres 1Y
0.957 – 1.013
Od 2010-07-18
Wczytywanie danych…

O tym wskaźniku

Co mierzy

Proximity MVRV divides BTC price by Proximity Realized Price, a cost-basis average that gives greater weight to holdings acquired near the current price. The unitless ratio measures price relative to that locally weighted cost, rather than the average cost of all supply.

Jak to czytać

Above 1, spot exceeds the weighted cost; below 1, it sits beneath it. Larger positive deviations describe more local paper profit. The middle half of historical readings lies roughly between 0.993 and 1.033, so small moves around 1 are normal for this measure, unlike the wider scale of standard MVRV.

The weighting changes with proximity to spot, so the underlying mix can shift even without coins changing hands. A reading below 1 does not mean most supply or all holders are underwater. Standard MVRV cycle thresholds do not transfer to this narrow-range ratio.

Częstotliwość
Dziennie (UTC 00:00)
Aktywo
BTC
Typ
Pojedyncza wartość
Dane od
2010-07-18
Najnowsze dane
2026-10-28
Punkty danych
5,947

FAQ

Why does Proximity MVRV usually stay close to 1?

Its denominator emphasizes costs near the current market price, so it naturally follows spot more closely than the all-supply average cost. The full-history median is about 1.006.

Does Proximity MVRV identify short-term holders?

No. Proximity refers to the distance between acquisition cost and current price, not a fixed holding-age cutoff. An older holding can receive weight if its cost is close to spot.

What was a notable high in Proximity MVRV?

It reached about 1.305 on December 16, 2017, meaning spot was roughly 30.5% above the proximity-weighted cost. That historical reading is context, not a reusable peak threshold.

Szukaj
Więcej