Entity-Adjusted Long-Term Holder CDD
- 1M1M
- 3M3M
- 6M6M
- 1Y1Y
- ALLALL
- LiniowaLiniowa
- LogarytmicznaLogarytmiczna
O tym wskaźniku
Co mierzy
Entity-Adjusted Long-Term Holder CDD sums transferred BTC multiplied by coin age for the long-term holder cohort after filtering identified internal movements. It is measured in BTC-days, with cohort allocation based on age weights centered around 155 days rather than a strict age gate for every output.
Jak to czytać
Higher values indicate more long-term-holder age being spent, combining transfer size and age. On July 29, 2019, this cohort accounted for about 256.7 million of the 259.9 million entity-adjusted BTC-days spent overall, showing how strongly mature holdings can dominate total CDD.
A large old position moving once can outweigh many smaller transfers; the reading is not the number of BTC transferred or the number of holders exiting. Entity classification and smooth cohort weights affect the split, and cross-entity custody movements can add age expenditure without a sale.
- Częstotliwość
- Dziennie (UTC 00:00)
- Aktywo
- BTC
- Kategoria
- Wskaźniki on-chain
- Typ
- Pojedyncza wartość
- Jednostka
- BTC-dni
- Dane od
- 2009-01-12
- Najnowsze dane
- 2026-10-28
- Punkty danych
- 6,499
FAQ
Why does LTH CDD often dominate total CDD?
Age multiplies the BTC amount. A modest transfer held for years can destroy more coin days than a much larger transfer held briefly, giving mature holdings an outsized influence.
How is LTH CDD different from LTH ASOL?
LTH CDD adds up BTC amount times age. LTH ASOL averages eligible output ages without BTC-volume weighting, so one measures total age expenditure while the other describes the age mix of outputs.
Does near-zero LTH CDD mean there are no long-term holdings?
No. Unspent holdings do not contribute to daily CDD. A low reading indicates little measured spending from the cohort, not an absence of long-term supply.
