bitunix

Exchange Withdrawing Addresses

Zakres
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LiniowaLiniowa
  • LogarytmicznaLogarytmiczna
Najnowsze
42.07K
2026-10-28 · 42,069
Zmiana 1D
+0.98%
Poprz. 41.66K
Zmiana 7D
+7.37%
Poprz. 39.18K
Zmiana 30D
-13.63%
Poprz. 48.71K
Percentyl 4Y
56%
Cała historia 80%
Najwyższa wartość w historii
105.33K
2023-06-06 · -60.06%
Zakres 1Y
28.37K – 78.45K
Od 2009-01-03
Wczytywanie danych…

O tym wskaźniku

Co mierzy

Exchange Withdrawing Addresses counts the unique Bitcoin addresses receiving BTC withdrawn from tracked exchange wallets each day. It is measured in recipient addresses per day, rather than withdrawal transactions or BTC withdrawn.

Jak to czytać

More recipients mean withdrawals reach a broader set of destinations; fewer recipients mean narrower participation, even if a large amount leaves. The count recorded 104,499 on November 14, 2022 and 105,330 on June 6, 2023, showing that large spikes have occurred outside price peaks. Compare withdrawal volume to distinguish many small recipients from fewer large ones.

Withdrawing may mean self-custody, a transfer to another service or routine operational movement, not a new purchase. Batching separates transaction count from recipient count, and exchange-address labels determine coverage. The series begins in 2009 with zero values; non-zero activity appears in the 2011 data.

Częstotliwość
Dziennie (UTC 00:00)
Aktywo
BTC
Kategoria
Adresy
Typ
Pojedyncza wartość
Dane od
2009-01-03
Najnowsze dane
2026-10-28
Punkty danych
6,508

FAQ

Does this count exchange wallets or withdrawal recipients?

The measure tracks recipient addresses associated with withdrawals from exchange wallets. It should not be interpreted as the number of exchange hot wallets sending transactions.

Do more withdrawal addresses mean exchange reserves must fall?

No. Deposits may exceed withdrawals in BTC terms even when many addresses receive withdrawals. Reserves and net flow describe amounts, while this series describes recipient breadth.

Why are the earliest years zero?

The stored history starts in 2009, but the 2009 and 2010 values are zero and the 2011 data contains non-zero observations. That early span is not evidence that exchanges already had measurable withdrawal participation in 2009.

Szukaj
Więcej