bitunix

Addresses with Balance ≥ 10K BTC

Zakres
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LiniowaLiniowa
  • LogarytmicznaLogarytmiczna
Najnowsze
87
2026-10-28 · 87
Zmiana 1D
0.00%
Poprz. 87
Zmiana 7D
0.00%
Poprz. 87
Zmiana 30D
-2.25%
Poprz. 89
Percentyl 4Y
17%
Cała historia 31%
Najwyższa wartość w historii
126
2016-06-28 · -30.95%
Zakres 1Y
84 – 92
Od 2009-01-03
Wczytywanie danych…

O tym wskaźniku

Co mierzy

Addresses with Balance ≥ 10K BTC counts Bitcoin addresses holding at least 10,000 BTC, including balances above that level. The series is measured in addresses: it counts very large balances rather than their combined coin holdings.

Jak to czytać

Because this is a small group, a handful of addresses entering or leaving can materially change the series. The high was 126 on June 28, 2016, compared with 104 at the April 2024 halving and 87 on October 17, 2026. A lower count can reflect large balances being divided among more wallets, rather than a reduction in the BTC owned by their controllers.

Exchange and custodian storage arrangements can strongly shape this tier, and one address may pool assets for many clients. The count neither identifies individual whales nor measures their net purchases. Pair it with the 10K–100K BTC and > 100K BTC supply bands to see whether fewer addresses also hold less supply.

Częstotliwość
Dziennie (UTC 00:00)
Aktywo
BTC
Kategoria
Adresy
Typ
Pojedyncza wartość
Dane od
2009-01-03
Najnowsze dane
2026-10-28
Punkty danych
6,508

FAQ

Why are there fewer than a few hundred 10,000-BTC addresses?

The threshold selects exceptionally large single-address balances. Even large owners may distribute funds among smaller addresses, so the count is much smaller than the number of people or institutions with substantial BTC exposure.

Does a falling 10,000-BTC count mean whales have left?

Not necessarily. Dividing a qualifying balance among addresses below 10,000 BTC removes it from this count even if ownership is unchanged. Large service wallets can also move funds for operational reasons.

Can the count fall while concentration increases?

Yes. Combining several qualifying addresses into one reduces the count and concentrates their coins at one address. Supply shares and ownership analysis are needed to assess concentration beyond this headcount.

Szukaj
Więcej