bitunix

Address Holder Retention Rate

Vaihteluväli
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Asteikko
  • LineaarinenLineaarinen
  • LogaritminenLogaritminen
Uusin
82.48%
2026-10-28 · 0.8247
1D-muutos
+0.13%
Edell. 82.37%
7D-muutos
+0.12%
Edell. 82.38%
30D-muutos
+0.13%
Edell. 82.37%
4Y-persentiili
90%
Koko historia 87%
Kaikkien aikojen huippu
100%
2009-01-03 · -17.52%
1Y-vaihteluväli
79.74% – 82.84%
Alkaen 2009-01-03
Ladataan dataa…

Tietoa tästä mittarista

Mitä se mittaa

Address Holder Retention Rate expresses the share of the measured address population classified as retained holders, displayed as a percentage. It tracks continuity of holding a BTC balance rather than repeated transaction activity.

Näin luet sitä

A high or rising rate indicates more persistent address-level holding within the measured population; a low or falling rate indicates less continuity. The series fell to about 34.97% on December 18, 2013. It was about 61.74% at the May 2020 halving and 80.34% at the April 2024 halving, reaching about 82.48% on October 17, 2026, so modern readings sit well above that early low.

An address retaining BTC need not hold the same coins or keep its balance unchanged. Address rotation and wallet consolidation can make a continuing investor look like an exiting address; old, dormant balances can also sustain retention without current demand. The rate measures address behavior and cannot reveal investor loyalty or predict price.

Tiheys
Päivittäin (UTC 00:00)
Omaisuuserä
BTC
Kategoria
Osoitteet
Tyyppi
Yksittäinen arvo
Dataa alkaen
2009-01-03
Uusin data
2026-10-28
Datapisteet
6,508

UKK

Does holder retention require an address to keep transacting?

No. A funded address can remain a holder without sending or receiving BTC in the current activity window. That is why holder retention and activity retention measure different behavior.

Does an 82% holder retention rate mean 82% of people never sold?

No. It is an address-based classification, not a survey of people or a record of every trade. Holders can trade inside custodial services or move between their own addresses.

Can holder retention improve while demand weakens?

Yes. Existing balances can remain in place even if new activity slows. Comparing retention with new addresses and balance changes helps distinguish persistence from fresh participation.