bitunix

Seller Exhaustion Constant

النطاق
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
المقياس
  • خطيخطي
  • لوغاريتميلوغاريتمي
الأحدث
0.0185
2026-11-02 · 0.018479
تغيّر 1D
+0.51%
السابق 0.0184
تغيّر 7D
+39.61%
السابق 0.0132
تغيّر 30D
-37.92%
السابق 0.0298
المئين 4Y
18%
السجل الكامل 19%
أعلى مستوى على الإطلاق
0.4645
2013-04-16 · -96.02%
نطاق 1Y
0.00686 – 0.0829
منذ 2009-01-03
جارٍ تحميل البيانات…

حول هذا المقياس

ما الذي يقيسه

The Seller Exhaustion Constant multiplies the fraction of Bitcoin supply in unrealized profit by 30-day price volatility. It is a dimensionless composite shown as a ratio, combining the breadth of profitable supply with recent price variability.

كيفية قراءته

Low values can reflect a small profitable share, subdued volatility, or both; the exhaustion interpretation is strongest when both inputs are low. Higher readings indicate a larger product of those inputs, not a direct count of sellers. On October 17, 2022, the value was about 0.0103, compared with a full-history median near 0.0429.

The product can hide different combinations of its inputs, so inspect supply in profit and volatility separately. A low reading does not prove sellers are finished, early zero values may reflect limited price history, and the exact volatility convention affects scale; it is not an annualized return or a probability.

التكرار
يومي (UTC 00:00)
الأصل
BTC
النوع
قيمة واحدة
البيانات منذ
2009-01-03
أحدث البيانات
2026-11-02
نقاط البيانات
6,513

الأسئلة الشائعة

Why is the Seller Exhaustion Constant not constant?

Constant is the indicator's name, not a claim that its value is fixed. Both the share of profitable supply and rolling price volatility change, so their product changes each day.

Does a low value always mean most coins are at a loss?

No. Very low volatility can produce a low result even if much of supply remains profitable. The two inputs need to be checked to distinguish quiet profitable markets from quiet markets with widespread losses.

Can the value be read as a percentage chance of a bottom?

No. It is a product of two inputs, with no calibrated probability interpretation. A reading of 0.01 does not mean a 1% chance of any market event.