bitunix

Entity-Adjusted Spent Volume Aged 1d–1w

النطاق
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
المقياس
  • خطيخطي
  • لوغاريتميلوغاريتمي
الأحدث
20.78K
2026-11-02 · 20,784.4188 · BTC
تغيّر 1D
+286.80%
السابق 5.37K
تغيّر 7D
+83.85%
السابق 11.3K
تغيّر 30D
+318.00%
السابق 4.97K
المئين 4Y
86%
السجل الكامل 41%
أعلى مستوى على الإطلاق
1.12M
2011-11-18 · -98.15%
نطاق 1Y
3.11K – 35.67K
منذ 2009-01-12
جارٍ تحميل البيانات…

حول هذا المقياس

ما الذي يقيسه

Entity-Adjusted Spent Volume Aged 1d–1w estimates daily BTC transferred between identified entities from coins last active one day to one week earlier. Transfers within the same identified entity are excluded; the unit is BTC per day, not an entity count.

كيفية قراءته

Higher values indicate more cross-entity movement of days-old coins after recognized internal transfers are removed; lower values indicate quieter activity in that window. The series reached about 50,797 BTC on November 21, 2024, and its 2025 maximum was about 35,680 BTC on November 21. These are activity comparisons, not proof of a common trading motive.

Entity grouping is inferred from address relationships, and updates can revise transfer classification. Cross-entity movement can include custody changes, payments and collateral transfers as well as trading. Do not assume an age-specific adjusted total is a simple fixed deduction from the raw series: ownership and age attribution need to be consistent before making that comparison.

التكرار
يومي (UTC 00:00)
الأصل
BTC
النوع
قيمة واحدة
الوحدة
BTC
البيانات منذ
2009-01-12
أحدث البيانات
2026-11-02
نقاط البيانات
6,504

الأسئلة الشائعة

What is removed by entity adjustment in this age band?

Recognized transfers between addresses controlled by the same entity are excluded. The aim is to reduce internal wallet churn while retaining estimated transfers between different participants.

Does this chart count how many entities transferred coins?

No. It sums BTC, so one large participant can contribute much more volume than many small participants. Entity counts and transaction counts are separate measures.

Can entity-adjusted 1d–1w volume be treated as net inflow to exchanges?

No. It includes qualifying transfers across identified entities generally and has no exchange-only direction. Exchange Net Flow separately measures deposits minus withdrawals for tracked exchange wallets.