bitunix

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume

Vaihteluväli
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Asteikko
  • LineaarinenLineaarinen
  • LogaritminenLogaritminen
Uusin
6.17K
2026-10-28 · 6,167.9014 · BTC
1D-muutos
+29.51%
Edell. 4.76K
7D-muutos
+21.07%
Edell. 5.09K
30D-muutos
-44.92%
Edell. 11.2K
4Y-persentiili
31%
Koko historia 42%
Kaikkien aikojen huippu
137.38K
2020-03-13 · -95.51%
1Y-vaihteluväli
884.25 – 30.03K
Alkaen 2012-02-18
Ladataan dataa…

Tietoa tästä mittarista

Mitä se mittaa

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume adds up the BTC moved on-chain from one identified exchange to another each day, in BTC. It measures gross cross-venue transfer value rather than exchange trading volume or net inflow to all exchanges combined.

Näin luet sitä

Elevated volume means more BTC is being redistributed between trading venues, potentially for liquidity, collateral or settlement. The series peaked at about 137,375 BTC on March 13, 2020, while its 2021 daily high was about 81,533 BTC; large cross-venue movements can therefore occur in very different price environments.

A large transfer may be operational and does not prove a new trade or fresh capital entering exchanges. Repeated transfers count again, and unidentified exchange addresses can affect coverage. Compare transfer count to distinguish a few large movements from frequent small ones, and net flow to assess the combined sector.

Tiheys
Päivittäin (UTC 00:00)
Omaisuuserä
BTC
Tyyppi
Yksittäinen arvo
Yksikkö
BTC
Dataa alkaen
2012-02-18
Uusin data
2026-10-28
Datapisteet
5,367

UKK

Why is inter-exchange volume not the same as exchange trading volume?

This series counts BTC transfers confirmed on the blockchain between venues. Exchange trading volume counts executed trades, most of which settle on internal ledgers without a separate on-chain transfer.

Can high inter-exchange volume coexist with little total net flow?

Yes. When both sides are identified, one venue's outgoing BTC is another's incoming BTC. Gross transfer volume can be large while the combined exchange sector has little net inflow or outflow.

What does rising volume with falling transfer count suggest?

With consistent coverage, it means more BTC is moving through fewer transfers, so the average amount per transfer is larger. It does not reveal who initiated the movements or why.