bitunix

Seller Exhaustion Constant

Діапазон
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Шкала
  • ЛінійнаЛінійна
  • ЛогарифмічнаЛогарифмічна
Останні
0.0138
2026-10-28 · 0.013786
Зміна за 1D
+1.67%
Попер. 0.0136
Зміна за 7D
+13.55%
Попер. 0.0121
Зміна за 30D
-49.18%
Попер. 0.0271
Перцентиль за 4Y
9%
Уся історія 14%
Історичний максимум
0.4645
2013-04-16 · -97.03%
Діапазон за 1Y
0.00686 – 0.0829
З 2009-01-03
Завантаження даних…

Про цю метрику

Що вимірює

The Seller Exhaustion Constant multiplies the fraction of Bitcoin supply in unrealized profit by 30-day price volatility. It is a dimensionless composite shown as a ratio, combining the breadth of profitable supply with recent price variability.

Як читати

Low values can reflect a small profitable share, subdued volatility, or both; the exhaustion interpretation is strongest when both inputs are low. Higher readings indicate a larger product of those inputs, not a direct count of sellers. On October 17, 2022, the value was about 0.0103, compared with a full-history median near 0.0429.

The product can hide different combinations of its inputs, so inspect supply in profit and volatility separately. A low reading does not prove sellers are finished, early zero values may reflect limited price history, and the exact volatility convention affects scale; it is not an annualized return or a probability.

Частота
Щодня (UTC 00:00)
Актив
BTC
Тип
Одне значення
Дані з
2009-01-03
Останні дані
2026-10-28
Точки даних
6,508

Часті запитання

Why is the Seller Exhaustion Constant not constant?

Constant is the indicator's name, not a claim that its value is fixed. Both the share of profitable supply and rolling price volatility change, so their product changes each day.

Does a low value always mean most coins are at a loss?

No. Very low volatility can produce a low result even if much of supply remains profitable. The two inputs need to be checked to distinguish quiet profitable markets from quiet markets with widespread losses.

Can the value be read as a percentage chance of a bottom?

No. It is a product of two inputs, with no calibrated probability interpretation. A reading of 0.01 does not mean a 1% chance of any market event.

Пошук
Більше