bitunix

Supply Held by Addresses with 100–1K BTC

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Siste
5.28M
2026-10-28 · 5,282,317.0861 · BTC
1D-endring
-0.05%
Forr. 5.28M
7D-endring
+0.10%
Forr. 5.28M
30D-endring
+0.69%
Forr. 5.25M
4Y-persentil
100%
Hele historikken 100%
Høyeste nivå noensinne
5.28M
2026-10-27 · -0.05%
1Y-intervall
5.06M – 5.28M
Siden 2009-01-03
Laster inn data…

Om denne måleverdien

Hva den måler

Supply Held by Addresses with 100–1K BTC is the sum of BTC balances at addresses in the 100–1,000 BTC interval on each day. The series is denominated in BTC and classifies individual addresses rather than grouping all wallets of one owner.

Slik leser du den

A rising line means this large-balance layer accounts for more BTC in absolute terms; a falling line means fewer coins sit in it. The series held about 3.893 million BTC at the April 2024 halving and recorded 5.2674 million BTC on October 16, 2026. Compare with 1K–10K BTC addresses to see whether nearby large-balance layers are moving together or diverging.

An increase is not enough to identify institutional accumulation: a larger custody wallet split into several addresses can produce the same result. A higher BTC total also need not mean a higher share of all supply, since circulating supply grows; ownership and concentration require additional context.

Frekvens
Daglig (UTC 00:00)
Aktiva
BTC
Kategori
Adresser
Type
Enkeltverdi
Enhet
BTC
Datapunkter
6,508

FAQ

Does 100–1,000 BTC identify institutional holders?

No. Balance size alone cannot distinguish individuals, custodians, exchanges or other organizations. One organization may also control addresses in several different bands.

What historical growth has this group recorded?

It held about 3.893 million BTC at the April 20, 2024 halving and reached 5.2674 million BTC on October 16, 2026. Those values show growth in the address band, without identifying the source or owners of the added balances.

Does a higher total mean Bitcoin ownership is more concentrated?

Not necessarily. You would need its share of circulating supply and information linking addresses to owners. Splitting one large wallet can lift this band while making the address distribution appear less concentrated.