bitunix

Receiving Addresses

رینج
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
اسکیل
  • لینیئرلینیئر
  • لاگلاگ
تازہ ترین
508.19K
2026-11-02 · 508,186
1D تبدیلی
+17.87%
پچھلا 431.14K
7D تبدیلی
+10.60%
پچھلا 459.48K
30D تبدیلی
+7.00%
پچھلا 474.96K
4Y پرسنٹائل
32%
مکمل ہسٹری 61%
تاریخی بلند ترین سطح
1.07M
2017-12-14 · -52.63%
1Y حد
380.34K – 707.81K
سے 2009-01-03
ڈیٹا لوڈ ہو رہا ہے…

اس پیمانے کے بارے میں

یہ کیا ناپتا ہے

Receiving Addresses counts the distinct Bitcoin addresses receiving coins in confirmed transactions each day, measured in addresses per day. An address counts once that day even if it receives multiple transfers.

اسے کیسے پڑھیں

Higher values mean coins are reaching a wider set of addresses; lower values mean fewer destinations are involved. The count reached about 1.073 million on December 14, 2017, and its 2023 high was about 1.018 million on September 15. Compare with sending addresses to see whether transfers fan out to many destinations or consolidate toward fewer ones.

Recipients can be new addresses, existing addresses or change addresses controlled by the sender. Batch withdrawals and wallet reorganizations may enlarge the count without adding users, while transfers inside exchanges and on second layers are outside this on-chain activity measure.

فریکوئنسی
روزانہ (UTC 00:00)
اثاثہ
BTC
قسم
واحد قدر
ڈیٹا کا آغاز
2009-01-03
تازہ ترین ڈیٹا
2026-11-02
ڈیٹا پوائنٹس
6,513

اکثر پوچھے گئے سوالات

How are Receiving Addresses different from New Addresses?

Receiving Addresses includes both previously used and first-time recipients on a given day. New Addresses only counts addresses receiving BTC for the first time.

Why can receiving addresses outnumber transactions?

One transaction can pay several recipients and return change to another address. The metric counts distinct destinations, not transaction records.

Can the same address be counted as both sending and receiving?

Yes. If an address spends coins and receives coins during the same day, it appears in both daily counts. Adding the two therefore overstates the number of unique active addresses.

تلاش کریں
مزید