bitunix

Supply Held by Addresses with 100–1K BTC

رینج
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
اسکیل
  • لینیئرلینیئر
  • لاگلاگ
تازہ ترین
5.29M
2026-11-02 · 5,287,070.881 · BTC
1D تبدیلی
+0.07%
پچھلا 5.28M
7D تبدیلی
+0.08%
پچھلا 5.28M
30D تبدیلی
+0.93%
پچھلا 5.24M
4Y پرسنٹائل
100%
مکمل ہسٹری 100%
تاریخی بلند ترین سطح
5.29M
2026-11-02 · 0.00%
1Y حد
5.06M – 5.29M
سے 2009-01-03
ڈیٹا لوڈ ہو رہا ہے…

اس پیمانے کے بارے میں

یہ کیا ناپتا ہے

Supply Held by Addresses with 100–1K BTC is the sum of BTC balances at addresses in the 100–1,000 BTC interval on each day. The series is denominated in BTC and classifies individual addresses rather than grouping all wallets of one owner.

اسے کیسے پڑھیں

A rising line means this large-balance layer accounts for more BTC in absolute terms; a falling line means fewer coins sit in it. The series held about 3.893 million BTC at the April 2024 halving and recorded 5.2674 million BTC on October 16, 2026. Compare with 1K–10K BTC addresses to see whether nearby large-balance layers are moving together or diverging.

An increase is not enough to identify institutional accumulation: a larger custody wallet split into several addresses can produce the same result. A higher BTC total also need not mean a higher share of all supply, since circulating supply grows; ownership and concentration require additional context.

فریکوئنسی
روزانہ (UTC 00:00)
اثاثہ
BTC
قسم
واحد قدر
یونٹ
BTC
ڈیٹا کا آغاز
2009-01-03
تازہ ترین ڈیٹا
2026-11-02
ڈیٹا پوائنٹس
6,513

اکثر پوچھے گئے سوالات

Does 100–1,000 BTC identify institutional holders?

No. Balance size alone cannot distinguish individuals, custodians, exchanges or other organizations. One organization may also control addresses in several different bands.

What historical growth has this group recorded?

It held about 3.893 million BTC at the April 20, 2024 halving and reached 5.2674 million BTC on October 16, 2026. Those values show growth in the address band, without identifying the source or owners of the added balances.

Does a higher total mean Bitcoin ownership is more concentrated?

Not necessarily. You would need its share of circulating supply and information linking addresses to owners. Splitting one large wallet can lift this band while making the address distribution appear less concentrated.

تلاش کریں
مزید