bitunix

Transfer Count

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Siste
568.59K
2026-10-28 · 568,594
1D-endring
+0.17%
Forr. 567.64K
7D-endring
+1.64%
Forr. 559.42K
30D-endring
-6.09%
Forr. 605.47K
4Y-persentil
7%
Hele historikken 52%
Høyeste nivå noensinne
1.99M
2015-09-02 · -71.49%
1Y-intervall
464.96K – 1.07M
Siden 2009-01-12
Laster inn data…

Om denne måleverdien

Hva den måler

Transfer Count totals the individual BTC transfers recorded on-chain each day, in transfers. A Bitcoin transaction can contain multiple recipient outputs, so a transfer count is distinct from a count of transactions or unique senders.

Slik leser du den

Rising counts show more frequent on-chain movement; falling counts show fewer transfers being recorded. The historical high was about 1.995 million on September 2, 2015, whereas the 2023 yearly high was about 1.690 million, illustrating that the busiest transfer day need not coincide with a price high.

Batch payments, repeated wallet activity and many small outputs can lift the count without a matching rise in economic value. Transfers are not necessarily changes of owner or purchases, and exchange-ledger trades and off-chain payments are outside this chain-based measure.

Frekvens
Daglig (UTC 00:00)
Aktiva
BTC
Type
Enkeltverdi
Data siden
2009-01-12
Nyeste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
6,499

FAQ

Why can transfer count exceed transaction count?

One transaction can pay several recipients through multiple outputs. Counting the resulting transfers can therefore produce a larger number than counting the transaction once.

Does one transfer mean one Bitcoin user?

No. A participant can send or receive repeatedly, and a service may process transfers for many customers. The metric measures activity rather than the number of people using Bitcoin.

How does Transfer Count relate to Transfers per Second?

The per-second series expresses daily transfer activity as a rate by dividing the count by the seconds in a day. It is the same activity on a different scale, not an independent measure of capacity.