bitunix

Seller Exhaustion Constant

रेंज
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
स्केल
  • लीनियरलीनियर
  • लॉगरिदमिकलॉगरिदमिक
नवीनतम
0.0138
2026-10-28 · 0.013786
1D बदलाव
+1.67%
पिछला 0.0136
7D बदलाव
+13.55%
पिछला 0.0121
30D बदलाव
-49.18%
पिछला 0.0271
4Y पर्सेंटाइल
9%
पूरा इतिहास 14%
ऑल-टाइम हाई
0.4645
2013-04-16 · -97.03%
1Y दायरा
0.00686 – 0.0829
कब से 2009-01-03
डेटा लोड हो रहा है…

इस मीट्रिक के बारे में

यह क्या मापता है

The Seller Exhaustion Constant multiplies the fraction of Bitcoin supply in unrealized profit by 30-day price volatility. It is a dimensionless composite shown as a ratio, combining the breadth of profitable supply with recent price variability.

इसे कैसे पढ़ें

Low values can reflect a small profitable share, subdued volatility, or both; the exhaustion interpretation is strongest when both inputs are low. Higher readings indicate a larger product of those inputs, not a direct count of sellers. On October 17, 2022, the value was about 0.0103, compared with a full-history median near 0.0429.

The product can hide different combinations of its inputs, so inspect supply in profit and volatility separately. A low reading does not prove sellers are finished, early zero values may reflect limited price history, and the exact volatility convention affects scale; it is not an annualized return or a probability.

आवृत्ति
दैनिक (UTC 00:00)
एसेट
BTC
प्रकार
एकल मान
डेटा कब से
2009-01-03
नवीनतम डेटा
2026-10-28
डेटा पॉइंट
6,508

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न

Why is the Seller Exhaustion Constant not constant?

Constant is the indicator's name, not a claim that its value is fixed. Both the share of profitable supply and rolling price volatility change, so their product changes each day.

Does a low value always mean most coins are at a loss?

No. Very low volatility can produce a low result even if much of supply remains profitable. The two inputs need to be checked to distinguish quiet profitable markets from quiet markets with widespread losses.

Can the value be read as a percentage chance of a bottom?

No. It is a product of two inputs, with no calibrated probability interpretation. A reading of 0.01 does not mean a 1% chance of any market event.