bitunix

Investor Capitalization

रेंज
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
स्केल
  • लीनियरलीनियर
  • लॉगरिदमिकलॉगरिदमिक
नवीनतम
$992.81B
2026-10-28 · 992,812,891,037.2013 · USD
1D बदलाव
+0.02%
पिछला $992.65B
7D बदलाव
+0.29%
पिछला $989.93B
30D बदलाव
+1.02%
पिछला $982.76B
4Y पर्सेंटाइल
83%
पूरा इतिहास 96%
ऑल-टाइम हाई
$1.04T
2025-11-26 · -4.80%
1Y दायरा
$964.72B – $1.04T
कब से 2009-01-03
डेटा लोड हो रहा है…

इस मीट्रिक के बारे में

यह क्या मापता है

Investor Capitalization is Realized Cap minus Thermocap, the cumulative USD value of miner revenue at the time it was earned. Expressed in USD, it discounts the miner-revenue component from the network's aggregate on-chain cost basis to form a modeled investor capital base.

इसे कैसे पढ़ें

Growth indicates that the on-chain cost base is expanding faster than the miner component; declines mean the opposite. Investor Cap ranged from about $335.7 billion to $428.5 billion in 2022, and reached a record of roughly $1.043 trillion on November 26, 2025. Compare it with market cap and Realized Cap to put the size in context.

This is an accounting model, not a ledger of net fiat deposits or investor cash available to spend. Last-move prices are proxies for acquisition costs, miner revenue is not mining profit, and the early zero values overlap a period with no usable market-price history.

आवृत्ति
दैनिक (UTC 00:00)
एसेट
BTC
प्रकार
एकल मान
इकाई
USD
डेटा कब से
2009-01-03
नवीनतम डेटा
2026-10-28
डेटा पॉइंट
6,508

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न

Why subtract Thermocap from Realized Cap?

Thermocap accumulates the USD value earned by miners over time. Subtracting it separates a modeled miner component from the broader cost base; it does not identify individual miner-owned coins.

Is Investor Cap the same as active investors' average cost?

No. Investor Cap is an aggregate USD amount. An active-investor price model also divides a capital measure by an estimate of active supply to obtain dollars per BTC.

Does a trillion-dollar Investor Cap mean a trillion dollars entered exchanges?

No. It is a difference between two accumulated valuation measures. Transfers can reprice coins without a cash trade, so the amount cannot be interpreted as total exchange deposits or net money inflows.