bitunix

WisdomTree Bitcoin ETF (BTCW) Estimated Holdings

Interval
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Seneste
2.05K
2026-10-28 · 2,054.3419 · BTC
1D-ændring
0.00%
Forr. 2.05K
7D-ændring
0.00%
Forr. 2.05K
30D-ændring
-0.02%
Forr. 2.05K
4Y-percentil
56%
Hele historikken 56%
Højeste niveau nogensinde
4.15K
2025-02-05 · -50.53%
1Y-interval
1.58K – 2.31K
Siden 2024-01-08
Indlæser data…

Om denne måling

Hvad den måler

WisdomTree Bitcoin ETF (BTCW) Estimated Holdings records the estimated quantity of bitcoin held for BTCW, in BTC. The coin balance isolates the size of the fund’s bitcoin inventory from fluctuations in its dollar value.

Sådan læses den

A rising coin balance indicates more bitcoin held for the fund, while a falling balance indicates less. BTCW’s recorded high was about 4,153 BTC on February 5, 2025, versus about 2,054 BTC on October 17, 2026. Relative changes can look large when the underlying inventory is modest, so check the absolute BTC change too.

Holdings can change through fund creations, redemptions, expenses and settlement timing. Estimates need not match a published fund total at every observation, and secondary-market share turnover does not directly alter the BTC inventory. A percentage change in holdings is not the fund’s return.

Frekvens
Dagligt (UTC 00:00)
Aktiv
BTC
Type
Enkelt værdi
Enhed
BTC
Data siden
2024-01-08
Seneste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
1,025

FAQ

How much BTC did WisdomTree BTCW hold at its recorded peak?

The series reached about 4,153 BTC on February 5, 2025. By October 17, 2026, the estimated balance was about 2,054 BTC.

Can a small BTCW transfer create a large percentage move?

Yes. The same BTC amount represents a larger percentage of a smaller starting balance. Read the absolute coin change alongside the percentage to judge the size of the movement.

Is BTCW holdings growth the same as ETF investment performance?

No. Holdings growth describes a change in coin quantity. Investment performance also depends on BTC price and fund costs, so an increase in holdings does not by itself imply a positive return.