bitunix

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume

النطاق
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
المقياس
  • خطيخطي
  • لوغاريتميلوغاريتمي
الأحدث
9.67K
2026-11-02 · 9,665.919 · BTC
تغيّر 1D
+15.14%
السابق 8.39K
تغيّر 7D
+56.12%
السابق 6.19K
تغيّر 30D
+9.30%
السابق 8.84K
المئين 4Y
59%
السجل الكامل 55%
أعلى مستوى على الإطلاق
137.38K
2020-03-13 · -92.96%
نطاق 1Y
859.44 – 29.91K
منذ 2012-02-18
جارٍ تحميل البيانات…

حول هذا المقياس

ما الذي يقيسه

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume adds up the BTC moved on-chain from one identified exchange to another each day, in BTC. It measures gross cross-venue transfer value rather than exchange trading volume or net inflow to all exchanges combined.

كيفية قراءته

Elevated volume means more BTC is being redistributed between trading venues, potentially for liquidity, collateral or settlement. The series peaked at about 137,375 BTC on March 13, 2020, while its 2021 daily high was about 81,533 BTC; large cross-venue movements can therefore occur in very different price environments.

A large transfer may be operational and does not prove a new trade or fresh capital entering exchanges. Repeated transfers count again, and unidentified exchange addresses can affect coverage. Compare transfer count to distinguish a few large movements from frequent small ones, and net flow to assess the combined sector.

التكرار
يومي (UTC 00:00)
الأصل
BTC
النوع
قيمة واحدة
الوحدة
BTC
البيانات منذ
2012-02-18
أحدث البيانات
2026-11-02
نقاط البيانات
5,372

الأسئلة الشائعة

Why is inter-exchange volume not the same as exchange trading volume?

This series counts BTC transfers confirmed on the blockchain between venues. Exchange trading volume counts executed trades, most of which settle on internal ledgers without a separate on-chain transfer.

Can high inter-exchange volume coexist with little total net flow?

Yes. When both sides are identified, one venue's outgoing BTC is another's incoming BTC. Gross transfer volume can be large while the combined exchange sector has little net inflow or outflow.

What does rising volume with falling transfer count suggest?

With consistent coverage, it means more BTC is moving through fewer transfers, so the average amount per transfer is larger. It does not reveal who initiated the movements or why.