bitunix

Supply Held by Entities with < 0.001 BTC

Zakres
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LiniowaLiniowa
  • LogarytmicznaLogarytmiczna
Najnowsze
5.46K
2026-10-28 · 5,457.6172 · BTC
Zmiana 1D
+0.27%
Poprz. 5.44K
Zmiana 7D
+1.12%
Poprz. 5.4K
Zmiana 30D
+3.23%
Poprz. 5.29K
Percentyl 4Y
100%
Cała historia 100%
Najwyższa wartość w historii
5.46K
2026-10-28 · 0.00%
Zakres 1Y
4.69K – 5.46K
Od 2009-01-03

O tym wskaźniku

Co mierzy

The under-0.001 BTC entity series sums balances below 0.001 BTC after related addresses have been grouped by inferred controller. Its unit is BTC, so the chart describes the total coin stock in the smallest balance tier rather than how many tiny balances exist.

Jak to czytać

A rise means more BTC is left in or allocated to very small entity balances; a fall means their combined stock has shrunk. The total grew from roughly 3,091 BTC in October 2022 to a record 5,464 BTC on October 17, 2026, illustrating how many individually small positions can build a measurable total.

Some balances may be residual or costly to spend relative to their value, but the 0.001 BTC cutoff is not a protocol dust threshold. Address grouping can change classification, and the total alone cannot establish adoption, the number of people involved or how much of the supply is economically spendable.

Częstotliwość
Dziennie (UTC 00:00)
Aktywo
BTC
Kategoria
Podmioty
Typ
Pojedyncza wartość
Jednostka
BTC
Dane od
2009-01-03
Najnowsze dane
2026-10-28
Punkty danych
6,508

FAQ

Is every entity below 0.001 BTC holding protocol dust?

No. Dust depends on output type, spending size and fee conditions, rather than a universal 0.001 BTC balance rule. This chart uses a balance-band cutoff, not a spendability test.

Do tiny addresses always belong in this entity band?

No. Several tiny addresses can share a controller whose combined balance is much larger. Entity grouping assigns them according to that total.

Can this metric show how many people own a small amount of Bitcoin?

It cannot. The series is a BTC sum rather than an entity count, and a clustered entity is not necessarily one person.

Szukaj
Więcej