bitunix

Entity-Adjusted Short-Term Holder Realized Profit

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Siste
1D-endring
7D-endring
30D-endring
4Y-persentil
Høyeste nivå noensinne
1Y-intervall
Laster inn data…

Om denne måleverdien

Hva den måler

Entity-Adjusted Short-Term Holder Realized Profit sums positive USD differences between transfer value and acquisition cost for coins moved by short-term holders each day. Transfers within the same identified entity are excluded; the cohort uses an average acquisition age around the 155-day boundary.

Slik leser du den

A rising total means recent holders are moving more coins at a profit, or realizing larger gains per coin; a decline means less profit is being realized, not necessarily more losses. The series reached about $3.17 billion on March 5, 2024, when BTC was around $68,341, showing how large this flow can become during strong price advances.

This is a gross profit flow, not profit minus loss, and it covers transfers to all destinations rather than only exchanges. Entity clustering and cohort assignment are estimates, while higher BTC prices can lift dollar totals without a matching increase in coins moved; an on-chain transfer does not prove a sale.

Frekvens
Daglig (UTC 00:00)
Aktiva
BTC
Type
Enkeltverdi
Enhet
USD
Data siden
2009-01-12
Nyeste data
2026-10-28

FAQ

How does STH realized profit differ from STH-MVRV?

Realized profit measures gains on coins actually moved during the day, in USD. STH-MVRV compares price with the cohort's average cost and describes unrealized gains or losses on holdings.

Does zero STH realized profit mean short-term holders lost money?

Zero means no positive gains were counted in the qualifying transfers. It does not quantify losses; short-term holder realized loss is a separate series.

What does entity-adjusted mean for realized profit?

Addresses believed to belong to one holder are grouped together, and internal transfers are removed. This reduces gains recorded solely because a holder rearranged wallets, although clustering cannot identify every internal move.