bitunix

Entity Net Growth

Intervallo
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Scala
  • LineareLineare
  • LogaritmicaLogaritmica
Più recenti
2.31K
2026-10-21 · 2,310
Variazione 1D
+288.90%
Prec. 594
Variazione 7D
-50.90%
Prec. 4.71K
Variazione 30D
-65.22%
Prec. 6.64K
Percentile 4Y
6%
Tutto lo storico 30%
Massimo storico
100.91K
2023-06-06 · -97.71%
Intervallo 1Y
-8.14K – 31.62K
Dal 2009-01-03

Informazioni sulla metrica

Cosa misura

Entity Net Growth measures additions to the Bitcoin holding-entity population minus entities leaving that population over the measurement period. Addresses estimated to share control are grouped first; the result is a signed count of entities, not a BTC flow.

Come leggerlo

Positive readings indicate net expansion of the measured holder population; negative readings indicate net contraction. The recorded high was +100,945 on June 6, 2023 and the low was -59,584 on August 19, 2023, showing that sharp swings can occur within a short interval. Growth should be assessed over multiple observations rather than one spike.

An entity leaving the holding population does not prove that a person stopped using Bitcoin: coins can move into another wallet or a custodian. Clustering revisions can also change the measured population. Check the observation date before comparing series; the supplied history here ends on October 10, 2026.

Frequenza
Giornaliero (UTC 00:00)
Asset
BTC
Categoria
Entità
Tipo
Valore singolo
Dati dal
2009-01-03
Dati più recenti
2026-10-21
Punti dati
6,501

FAQ

How does Entity Net Growth differ from New Entities?

New Entities is a gross count of first-seen entities. Net growth also accounts for entities leaving the measured holding population, so it can be far smaller or even negative while new entities continue to appear.

Does negative entity growth mean Bitcoin is losing that many users?

No. It means the measured holding-entity population contracted on a net basis. Transfers to custody, changes in wallet structure and clustering updates can change entity counts without an equal change in people using Bitcoin.

Can Entity Net Growth be compared directly with exchange net flow?

Their units differ: one counts entities and the other measures BTC. A small number of large holders can move substantial BTC, while many small entities can change the count with little value transferred.