bitunix

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume

Tartomány
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skála
  • LineárisLineáris
  • LogaritmikusLogaritmikus
Legutóbbi
6.17K
2026-10-28 · 6,167.9014 · BTC
1D változás
+29.51%
Előző 4.76K
7D változás
+21.07%
Előző 5.09K
30D változás
-44.92%
Előző 11.2K
4Y percentilis
31%
Teljes előzmény 42%
Történelmi csúcs
137.38K
2020-03-13 · -95.51%
1Y tartomány
884.25 – 30.03K
Kezdete 2012-02-18
Adatok betöltése…

A mutatóról

Mit mér

Exchange-to-Exchange Transfer Volume adds up the BTC moved on-chain from one identified exchange to another each day, in BTC. It measures gross cross-venue transfer value rather than exchange trading volume or net inflow to all exchanges combined.

Hogyan értelmezzük

Elevated volume means more BTC is being redistributed between trading venues, potentially for liquidity, collateral or settlement. The series peaked at about 137,375 BTC on March 13, 2020, while its 2021 daily high was about 81,533 BTC; large cross-venue movements can therefore occur in very different price environments.

A large transfer may be operational and does not prove a new trade or fresh capital entering exchanges. Repeated transfers count again, and unidentified exchange addresses can affect coverage. Compare transfer count to distinguish a few large movements from frequent small ones, and net flow to assess the combined sector.

Gyakoriság
Napi (UTC 00:00)
Eszköz
BTC
Típus
Egyetlen érték
Egység
BTC
Adatok kezdete
2012-02-18
Legfrissebb adatok
2026-10-28
Adatpontok
5,367

GYIK

Why is inter-exchange volume not the same as exchange trading volume?

This series counts BTC transfers confirmed on the blockchain between venues. Exchange trading volume counts executed trades, most of which settle on internal ledgers without a separate on-chain transfer.

Can high inter-exchange volume coexist with little total net flow?

Yes. When both sides are identified, one venue's outgoing BTC is another's incoming BTC. Gross transfer volume can be large while the combined exchange sector has little net inflow or outflow.

What does rising volume with falling transfer count suggest?

With consistent coverage, it means more BTC is moving through fewer transfers, so the average amount per transfer is larger. It does not reveal who initiated the movements or why.

Keresés
Továbbiak