bitunix

Exchange Withdrawing Addresses

Диапазон
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Скала
  • ЛинейнаЛинейна
  • ЛогаритмичнаЛогаритмична
Най-нови
42.07K
2026-10-28 · 42,069
Промяна за 1D
+0.98%
Пред. 41.66K
Промяна за 7D
+7.37%
Пред. 39.18K
Промяна за 30D
-13.63%
Пред. 48.71K
Перцентил за 4Y
56%
Цялата история 80%
Исторически връх
105.33K
2023-06-06 · -60.06%
Диапазон за 1Y
28.37K – 78.45K
От 2009-01-03
Зареждане на данни…

За този показател

Какво измерва

Exchange Withdrawing Addresses counts the unique Bitcoin addresses receiving BTC withdrawn from tracked exchange wallets each day. It is measured in recipient addresses per day, rather than withdrawal transactions or BTC withdrawn.

Как да се чете

More recipients mean withdrawals reach a broader set of destinations; fewer recipients mean narrower participation, even if a large amount leaves. The count recorded 104,499 on November 14, 2022 and 105,330 on June 6, 2023, showing that large spikes have occurred outside price peaks. Compare withdrawal volume to distinguish many small recipients from fewer large ones.

Withdrawing may mean self-custody, a transfer to another service or routine operational movement, not a new purchase. Batching separates transaction count from recipient count, and exchange-address labels determine coverage. The series begins in 2009 with zero values; non-zero activity appears in the 2011 data.

Честота
Дневно (UTC 00:00)
Актив
BTC
Категория
Адреси
Тип
Единична стойност
Данни от
2009-01-03
Последни данни
2026-10-28
Точки от данни
6,508

Често задавани въпроси

Does this count exchange wallets or withdrawal recipients?

The measure tracks recipient addresses associated with withdrawals from exchange wallets. It should not be interpreted as the number of exchange hot wallets sending transactions.

Do more withdrawal addresses mean exchange reserves must fall?

No. Deposits may exceed withdrawals in BTC terms even when many addresses receive withdrawals. Reserves and net flow describe amounts, while this series describes recipient breadth.

Why are the earliest years zero?

The stored history starts in 2009, but the 2009 and 2010 values are zero and the 2011 data contains non-zero observations. That early span is not evidence that exchanges already had measurable withdrawal participation in 2009.

Търсене
Още