bitunix

Miner Outflow Multiple

Intervall
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skala
  • LineærLineær
  • LogaritmiskLogaritmisk
Siste
0.883
2026-10-28 · 0.8828
1D-endring
+67.78%
Forr. 0.526
7D-endring
-66.26%
Forr. 2.62
30D-endring
-3.13%
Forr. 0.911
4Y-persentil
54%
Hele historikken 44%
Høyeste nivå noensinne
48.5
2010-02-10 · -98.18%
1Y-intervall
0.298 – 6.65
Siden 2009-01-03
Laster inn data…

Om denne måleverdien

Hva den måler

Miner Outflow Multiple divides the daily BTC transferred out of identified miner wallets by the one-year moving average of that outflow. The result is a unitless multiple: above 1 means outflow exceeds its yearly norm, while below 1 means it is lower.

Slik leser du den

Rising readings indicate more intense miner transfers relative to the yearly baseline, while falling readings indicate quieter outflows. A pronounced spike reached 40.106 on December 28, 2020; the full-history median is close to 1 at about 0.983. A large multiple identifies an unusual transfer day, not its destination or purpose.

Miner transfers can include treasury movements, custody changes and wallet reorganizations rather than sales. Address attribution and the moving baseline affect the ratio, and the earliest data cannot draw on a full prior year of network history. Check absolute outflows and exchange destinations before attributing a spike to market supply.

Frekvens
Daglig (UTC 00:00)
Aktiva
BTC
Kategori
Mining
Type
Enkeltverdi
Data siden
2009-01-03
Nyeste data
2026-10-28
Datapunkter
6,508

FAQ

What does a Miner Outflow Multiple above 1 mean?

The daily miner outflow is above its one-year moving average. The threshold describes relative transfer activity, not a fixed amount of BTC or a price signal.

Is this the same as the Puell Multiple?

No. Miner Outflow Multiple normalizes BTC leaving miner wallets. The Puell Multiple compares the USD value of newly issued coins with its annual average, measuring issuance revenue rather than transfers.

Does a spike confirm that miners are selling on exchanges?

No. The multiple does not identify a sale or an exchange destination. Internal treasury operations or custody transfers can also create large outflows, so destination data is needed to investigate the cause.