bitunix

Likely Lost Supply

Tartomány
  • 1M1M
  • 3M3M
  • 6M6M
  • 1Y1Y
  • ALLALL
Skála
  • LineárisLineáris
  • LogaritmikusLogaritmikus
Legutóbbi
1.46M
2026-10-28 · 1,455,559.3161 · BTC
1D változás
+0.00%
Előző 1.46M
7D változás
+0.00%
Előző 1.46M
30D változás
+0.00%
Előző 1.46M
4Y percentilis
4%
Teljes előzmény 6%
Történelmi csúcs
2.89M
2010-06-30 · -49.70%
1Y tartomány
1.46M – 1.46M
Kezdete 2009-01-03
Adatok betöltése…

A mutatóról

Mit mér

Likely Lost Supply is the total BTC classified as probably lost by the underlying supply model. It is an estimate in BTC rather than proof of inaccessible private keys; the supplied metadata does not document the model's eligibility rules.

Hogyan értelmezzük

A higher value assigns more supply to the probably lost category, while a decline removes coins from that estimate. The series peaked near 2.89 million BTC in June 2010 and stood near 1.46 million on October 17, 2026. Its ability to fall is a reminder that this is a revisable classification rather than a cumulative count of confirmed losses.

An unmoved coin may still be spendable, and the blockchain cannot reveal whether a private key has been lost. Do not infer a fixed dormancy cutoff from the metric name or equate it with all coins inactive for several years. Understand the model rules before using the estimate to adjust supply.

Gyakoriság
Napi (UTC 00:00)
Eszköz
BTC
Kategória
Kínálat
Típus
Egyetlen érték
Egység
BTC
Adatok kezdete
2009-01-03
Legfrissebb adatok
2026-10-28
Adatpontok
6,508

GYIK

Can the blockchain prove how many bitcoins are lost?

It can show that coins remain unspent, but that alone cannot prove their keys are unavailable. This is a model estimate, not a count of all provably unspendable coins.

Why can Likely Lost Supply decrease?

Previously classified coins may move, or a model classification may change. The series declined from about 1.55 million BTC at the 2012 halving to about 1.46 million at the 2024 halving, so it is not a permanently increasing tally.

Is Likely Lost Supply the same as supply unmoved for five years?

No such equivalence is documented for this series. A five-year dormancy measure uses an explicit age threshold, whereas this estimate's eligibility rules are not provided in the available metadata.

Keresés
Továbbiak